As the western mass media are unwilling to tell the truth about NATO’s predatory war of aggression against Libya, former US congresswoman Cynthia McKinney traveled to Libya and brought home some pictures.
Yesterday, Friday, July 1st, 2011, the leader of the Libyan revolution Muammar Gaddafi addressed via telephone a very large crowd of hundreds of thousands of people, which gathered in Tripoli in support of revolution leader Muammar Gaddafi and the Libyan government. Here is a video of that speech.
A whole month it’s now ago since NATO decided to bomb Libya. In the meantime on Libya was - under the pretext of the protection of people - dropped virtually the entire European NATO stocks of laser bombs. Countless people were thereby murdered and large parts of Libya have been radioactively posioned for a long time by the depleted uranium contained in NATO’s bombs.
For anyone who has eyes to see and a head to think it is clear that NATO is not after protecting people. The leaders of the warring NATO allies even say it openly, what they are really after, “Gaddafi must go” , or “regime change” and thereby they deliberately stifle any opportunity for a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
Only slowly the public in the warring NATO countries understands that they are systematically lied upon Libya and that the NATO is not bombing Libya to protect people, but actually NATO is just running a long pre-planned predatory war of aggression against Libya. More and more it appears that, although charges against the Libyan government taken as reasons for war are wrong, that the NATO-sponsored “rebels” perpetrate the very crimes that the Libyan government is falsely accused of.
Any reasonable observer of political events has understood clearly that Mearsheimer and Walt were right in their analysis that Israel - although it has masked it well - was the main reason for the war on Iraq, for the sake of enforcement of the concept paper “A Clean Break“, which laid out the domination plans of the Zionist apartheid regime. The war of aggression against Libya seems to be hardly different. Here, too, an important reason for the attack is the wish of the Zionist apartheid regime, to go a step further to build a Greater Israel despite threats of peace enforcement.
The heartbreaking pictures went around the world. And the texts were heartbreaking, too. The text to one of Getty’s pictures reads: “Soft toys are left in the interior of the bus where an Israeli teenager was critically wounded when a projectile from Gaza slammed into it as it took children home from school on April 7, 2011 near the southern Israeli Kibbutz of Nahal Oz, Israel. Israeli forces struck Gaza in return, bombing a compound in nothern Gaza belonging to Hamas.”
How the NATO standard of human rights looks like, the murderous bombing near Kunduz on September 4th, 2009, has shown to the world. How action for human rights in compliance the rules of engagement looks like from the perspective of the US army, everybody can watch in the video Collateral Murder. When dealing with prisoners, the U.S. and its lackeys set long-lasting standards on human rights, too: torture like in Abu Ghraib , spontaneous killings like in Baghdad and mass executions like in Dasht-i-Leili are typical features of the human rights standard of the NATO’s leading power USA.
Now Libya is going to get human rights in accordance with NATO standards.
What wrong with media? Ok, little cats all know this. But for the rest, here is it again as Saturday night movie: Danny Schechter’s Weapons of mass deception:
Howdy, little cats. You all know, what the zionist fascists of Israel do. But how they manage to get the media to not reporting their crimes in the USA? Have a look.
Oh, I just found a great catty trailer of a movie of John Pilger named “The War On Democracy“. Nice to see, that a movie may make it into UK cinemas, that probably uncovers the blatant propaganda lies of the so-called “free media” to discredit Venezuela’s president Hugo Chavez.
Do you think the USA is a country to be proud of press freedom? If so, you might have a look at the 2004 movie “Orwell Rolls in his Grave“, it is interesting to view nowadays, too:
But even if the movie got a nice review from crane, there is missing a major part of the story in that movie. The part not covered is that information is crucial as well for news corps as for intelligence. So what thought may be closer than to examine who pulls the strings behind.
It is told, that CIA director William Colby told recruits: “The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media.” Well, I can’t tell you, if that’s true, but let us think for a moment, it would be true.
Is it possible, that Rupert Murdoch and his wealthy collegues owning the world’s mass meda are just puppets of the CIA? Sounds crazy. Billionaire Rupert Murdoch doesn’t seem to be a cheap journalist. But, just imagine, the CIA would be able to control the media by having the people running the media somehow - maybe with compromising material - in their hands.
Wouldn’t it sound logical then, that a chief of the CIA like George H. W. Bush would make himself president? I wouldn’t say, it was this way, but just imagine, it was the way - couldyo u name such a country ran be an intelligence service name a democracy?
![]() |
| Enhanced Internet Regulation |
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Sep | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||
Par·tei·buch n. German: Booklet with personal data and number to prove membership in a party