Mein-Parteibuch.org

The CIA’s Wall Street Journal, the neo-conservative New York Times and many other English-language media and even the Chinese news agency Xinhua just wrote in big letters that the USA have asked Pakistan, to stop “harassment” of their “diplomats”. It is quite uncommon that a country tries to escalate diplomatic differences a with friendly country over the mass media, rather than resolving it discreetly. Pakistan is for the United States an important “partner” in it’s struggle for world domination, which is sold as a global war on terror.

US diplomacy at work

Copyright 2009 Zeitung via Oraclesyndicat

In the version from the Wall Street Jounal and connected the Western propaganda outlets, the story of American-Pakistani diplomatic dispute is told somehow like this: Pakistani authorities and security forces are harassing U.S. diplomats in Pakistan by arresting them temporarily, searching their cars and systematically delaying visa requests. Because American diplomats fear terror attacks and they don’t get inconspicuous vehicle number plates, they use just somewhere gotten civilian number plates, like most western embassies do. Due to this harassment, the U.S. now has difficulties in implementing its five-year program to support civilian projects in Pakistan, which is worth 1.5 billion U.S. dollars annually. The Pakistani government calls to pay the money to itself, so that it can spend the money where it is needed, but the U.S. doesn’t do this, because it fears the money could seep then. The Wall Street Journal suggests, that behind the harassment campaign that impedes peace and development in Pakistan is the Pakistani intelligence service ISI. That’s what the story looks like in Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal. The New York Times adds to this at least in a subordinate clause that the U.S. embassy in Islamabad has plans to increase its staff to implement its assistance program in Pakistan from 500 to 800 people and said casually that the Pakistani President Zardari demands to stop the air strikes by the U.S. drones on Pakistani territory, and instead propose to give Pakistan the drone technology.

In Pakistan the background story appears to be a bit different. First of all, it is carefully noted in Pakistan that the U.S. is used to hire as diplomats for Pakistan murder gangs of the notorious company Blackwater. The U.S. and the Pakistani government officially deny that mercenaries from Blackwater kill people in Pakistan, but since it was announced that the suicide attack on the secret drone base in Afghanistan’s Khost killed two mercenaries from Blackwater, the official claims have been exposed as a flat lie.

But the troubles of the U.S. in Pakistan are even more serious. Zahid Malik explained on December 7th in Pakistan Observer in detail, that the head of the ISI, General Ahmed Shuja Pasha, personally confronted the CIA boss Leon Panetta with evidence that the U.S. supports warlords and terrorist groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan to to destabilize Pakistan. It is also publicly known which role Stanley McCrystal’s JSOC terrorist group plays in this dirty war. As everyone in Pakistan knows that the U.S. run a secret war against Pakistan, this is not entirely surprising, but disastrous for the U.S. In the eyes of the Pakistani population the U.S. is widely decried as a haven of terrorist gangs like Blackwater and JSOC and any Pakistani government making common cause with the United States, is considered a gang of traitors.

The most important point is, that the United States under Barack Obama try to deceive Pakistan. The USA promised a fight at the side of Pakistan, but they secretly fought it against Pakistan and they were caught. Worse it couldn’t be for the USA. In this situation even the 1.5 US dollar yearly bribe help them out, which the US will surely pay soon directly to the government. If the USA does not fulfill the wishes of the Pakistani government and the ISI, the ISI just needs to let it’s ISI-controlled Taliban off the leash, and there will be no supplies for the U.S. occupation forces in Afghanistan via Pakistan anymore. Pakistan can add to it’s demands whatever it wants whenever it wants, because the USA are completely dependent on the supply routes through Pakistan. Barack Obama would like to increase his troops needed in Afghanistan to secure the production of heroin by about 30 - 40,000 official soldiers. As for the supply routes to feed his troops in Afghanistan he has the following possibilities: Pakistan, Russia, and Iran. As the U.S. has no internal influence in Iran and Russia, these countries are no real options for the USA. The result is that whenever Pakistan closes the supply routes, Barack Obama will lose the opium war in Afghanistan and Pakistan wins. Until then, however, Pakistan may ask the U.S. what it wants, and the U.S. must pay whatever the price is. If the USA is escalating its diplomatic dispute with Pakistan now over the media suspect that suggests that the US administration has just now realized, in what kind of an ugly trap they have run in Afghanistan.

Was it previously not possible to guess this? Honestly, who is stupid enough to go for an invasion of Afghanistan? Ok, the thinktank IASPS was so stupid to propose it, but they were even stupid enough to call for war on Iraq for the reorganization of the Middle East as Israel liked to have it. It is noteworthy that Barack Obama still follows this Zionist-trimmed war policy, although for the U.S. it brings nothing but predictable disaster.

The Iranian Press TV station is by the way modest: it reported that five Americans were arrested because they used fake number plates, but that they were released later because the U.S. embassy said that it were diplomats. Oh, and before it is forgotten, when U.S. Marines raid the Algerian embassy in Baghdad, then it is of course something completely different and in no means harassment or a violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.